Pages: [1] |
1. Step away from the unsub button! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grey Stormshadow wrote: David Rivard wrote: No. The entire IDEA that they should remove the generic battlecruiser and destroyer skills in favor of more race specific training is abhorrent and short sited. I clicked unsub four times You're...
- by David Rivard - at 2012.03.07 01:25:00
|
2. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: David Rivard wrote: This is really a shameless way of making is spend way too much time training ships. I never used, don't even have the skill trained for, destroyers. I am NOT going to waste my time and patience training a ...
- by David Rivard - at 2012.03.07 01:21:00
|
3. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This is really a shameless way of making is spend way too much time training ships. I never used, don't even have the skill trained for, destroyers. I am NOT going to waste my time and patience training a ship I will never use, just to get into sh...
- by David Rivard - at 2012.03.07 01:18:00
|
4. New dev blog: The good, the bad and the "oh god my eyes just vomited" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I agree. The generic battlecruiser and destroyer skills must remain the way they are. Kill the tiers, I don't care. But I am not going to train up destroyers (a ship I have YET to use) just to fly useful ships in each race. It is a shameless way t...
- by David Rivard - at 2012.03.07 01:13:00
|
5. Step away from the unsub button! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No. The entire IDEA that they should remove the generic battlecruiser and destroyer skills in favor of more race specific training is abhorrent and short sited. I clicked unsub four times
- by David Rivard - at 2012.03.07 01:11:00
|
6. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
And here I was worried they were getting back on the right track. Thank god the incompetent CCP I know and love is back. For the love of christ, this is a terrible, terrible idea. Don't you dare take away the ability to train generic battlecruise...
- by David Rivard - at 2012.03.06 18:45:00
|
7. Dear CCP: Why don't you learn? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Jacob cirth wrote: Nope. So there is no issue at all then, if it's not one of the first two. After all, there is no error and nothing to correct as far as anyone has been able to show. Pretty certain he's referring to the f...
- by David Rivard - at 2011.11.29 22:09:00
|
8. FONT - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Punkturis wrote: Salpun wrote: E Wan wrote: CCP Punkturis wrote: Vaaron Remar wrote: I have great problems using the new UI/Font (screen resolution 1680 x 1050). The new font ist way better readable than the old one, yes BUT ...
- by David Rivard - at 2011.11.29 22:08:00
|
9. Dear CCP: Why don't you learn? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GavinCapacitor wrote: Trolling / 0/10 / test server for months / HTFU / can I have your stuff Pick 1+ Thread is bad OP should feel bad. Honestly, it's insulting to ask a paying customer to do a QA tester's job and go on the test server. Wh...
- by David Rivard - at 2011.11.29 21:11:00
|
10. Current rules? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ACE McFACE wrote: Pvlogiwhodidntknowwhatwashappening is not PvP Pvrandommackgank is not PvP Therefore, there are no PvP nerfs Just to clarifiy, I am not some crying miner who just lost his mack If you're undocked, you're PVPing. Anyone who ...
- by David Rivard - at 2011.11.14 22:22:00
|
11. CCP Aggression Settings Wrong? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Takseen wrote: GAYNINJAS wrote: This is all well and good for people who are incapable of paying attention (read incursion runners), but this change has introduced several problems that can end up being quite costly. For example: 1. Pla...
- by David Rivard - at 2011.11.13 18:13:00
|
12. CCP Aggression Settings Wrong? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GAYNINJAS wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Mashie Saldana wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: In general, if you use any assistance module on a target, you receive ALL aggression flags that your target has for 15 minutes. Thus if your target is at war,...
- by David Rivard - at 2011.11.13 16:53:00
|
13. [NO CONFIDENCE] CSM supports microtransactions. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: David Rivard on 14/06/2011 15:33:25 Edited by: David Rivard on 14/06/2011 15:20:00 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1527783 Originally by: CCP Zinfandel In this first version of the store, we ...
- by David Rivard - at 2011.06.14 15:17:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |